Cry the beloved Country, the Sceptre may not hold

Cry the beloved Country, the Sceptre may not hold

A sceptre has been looming over our heads, a sceptre called Biafra. For 42 years it has defied gravity and remained poised up above the firmament of the geographical location called Nigeria.

This sceptre most recently was brandished a little closer to our heads by the publishing of Achebe’s book, There was a Country.

It has brought wars. Wars for now, only in an intellectual capacity, fought with the pen and keyboards on Newspapers and on social media. Old friendships have been threatened and new alliances forged. 42 years ago, allegedly, there was no victor, no vanquished; today, for now, that status quo remains. But how long until the balance gives?

Some fear the war would soon be brought down from the virtual world. Tempers are flaring and grievances are being remembered. Stratagems are being mulled over and positions are being noted. This perhaps was a little more than Achebe intended as he said in the book, “My aim is not to provide all the answers but to raise questions and perhaps to cause a few headaches”. Achebe is causing more than just a few headaches.

The Biafran war was fought between Biafra, a secessionist state and Federal forces of Nigeria. Today, the war would be fought by Igbo’s against Awolowo’s Yoruba on one side, and Igbo’s against the Hausa’s on the other. It will be fought by the children who knew nothing of the war except from biased indoctrination by their parents. This generation is largely confused. From the biased accounts, many of the generation believe the war was fought between Awolowo and some hapless Igbo women and children who he allegedly starved to death. Others believe the war was fought between Igbo civilians and Hausa soldiers, very few understand that the war was between a secessionist Biafra and the federal forces of Nigeria.

This mis-information and dis-education has led many intellectuals to clamour that the Biafran story be exhumed, and for the Biafran sceptre to be brought down and wielded -blood, gore and all – for all to confront, and a damn to the consequences. They believe it is history and this history must be taught in our schools, churches and anywhere it would be heard. They believe truth must be faced squarely and that closure is necessary. For them, calamity was wrought and that calamity must be discoursed and judged. Perhaps they seek consolation or apologies or just that Nigeria accepts the fact that genocide was committed within its borders. They think no further than this. They do not consider what their clamour might bring.

An opposing assemblage does not agree. They believe Biafra died long ago, and that it is usually always better that dead things remain dead. They fear that the dead Biafra exhumed will drag many innocent living back to the grave with it. This deferring faction cringe at the thought of what Biafran history will do in classes where it is taught. They have come down to the particulars, the reality, of what such divergent views of history will be like. They imagine a scenario, in a class, where two friends sit, one Hausa and one Igbo, and a lecturer walks in and expansiates on how the Hausa student’s father led an army of angry soldiers to the other friend’s hometown, killing and raping children and women, or how an Igbo mob lynched a group of Hausa traders in Onitsha. They imagine a football stadium where a Hausa footballer misses a shot in a crucial international competition, and one Igbo fan makes a remark on how the Hausa soldiers never missed a shot when it was aimed at Biafran women and children. They imagine a market place where this scepter of Biafran history is brought down.

Biafran history cannot be taught without bias.

An Igbo tutor will recount the tale of how his mother, wife and sisters were raped and butchered; the Hausa man will have no recollection of that, he will remember a war fought to retain the unity of his beloved Nigeria from ambitious and separatist elements.

Imagine a society, already filled with hate and deep gullies of tribal sentiments being given fodder for further mayhem. If it is a human society, blood will spill.

Humans do not learn; Nigerians do not consider that history repeats itself because of rehashing and exhuming of sentiments and mistakes. History repeats itself because we learn from history. Are the World Wars studied so that it could be avoided or so that the next war would be better fought? Is it true that governments have noted their military mistakes and have corrected themselves for the next engagement?

What will the Biafran history teach?

History cannot be forgotten, but where there is no singular true rendition of said history, where a people are not ready for such history, and where this history has the capacity to destroy a nation and innocent citizens, then that history should be left asleep.

If the story of Biafra must be exhumed, then, by all means, let us exhume Awolowo, Ojukwu, the soldiers and lives that were lost, and all the stake holders in that war; let them sit down with the likes of Yakubu Gowon and the living parties of the war. Let them tell us what they did in Biafra. Let them tell us what they did to our country, Nigeria. If history is truly the concern then let Nigerian history be taught. Biafran history is not the Nigerian history. The Civil war of 1967 is Nigerian history. What caused the Civil war? What caused the cause of the Civil war, and what caused that one too? What caused Nigeria? First causes. We should go back to the first cause of things and learn the truth. Biafran history can only be told by Biafrans and it will always be one-sided.

Those who were in the war and others who know of wars are noticeably silent. Even today after hundreds of years the slave story is still selectively taught.  In a bus, on a train, in a prison or in anywhere, it will be unwise to engage in a discussion of how African slaves were branded and burnt by white supremacists, when whites are sitting on a side and blacks on the other.

Many governments have secrets and classified files, not because they thrive in secrecy, but because of the volatility of the information and history being classified.  Certain historical truths constitute threats to national security; some facts, no matter how true would pose threats to world peace. The story of Biafra is a threat to Nigeria and Nigeria is not ready to face that threat.

We should face our demons one after the other. This is not the time for tribal sentiments. This is a time for survival which we can only attain through unity. This is a time to curb excesses and lawlessness. This is a time to curb certain liberties. Freedom should have its limits. There should be no freedom to insult the religion of others and defame what others term holy and sacred. It is a pity that Nigeria respects all the wrong freedoms: freedom to lynch, loot, and freedom of speech and information that will incite loss of innocent lives.

Prof Chinua Achebe has exercised his freedom, he experienced the war, he is Igbo, he is biased, and he is an old man. There is a reason men wait till they are old, dying or dead before they publish memoirs: It can no longer hurt them.

A country of excesses, this Nigeria: excess resources, excess idiotic leaders, excess crime, excess religion, excess injustice, excess wise men, excess opinions, excess riches, excess poverty, excess people, excess deaths, excess freedom and excess scepters.

We need restraint. Let us hold; let us not be too quick to bring down the sceptre of Biafra, it is worse than all the other sceptres haunting us. We must fight to keep Nigeria one, we must curb certain freedom of expressions harmful to innocent lives. There are those who still love this country deep down in there hearts. There are those who wish they can die for this country. There are those who remember the thrill we have shared in rare moments of national unity. There are those who know that a Nigeria without the Hausa is no nation; a Nigeria without the illustrious Igbos is bereft, and a Nigeria without the Yoruba is inconceivable.

This essay is for them.

 

 

First Published on Ramblings



26 thoughts on “Cry the beloved Country, the Sceptre may not hold” by kaycee (@kaycee)

  1. good work. i pray we would ressurect more chaos. not all truth must be said

    1. A time for everything
      @laworemike
      Thanks for reading.

  2. When it comes to Nigeria, I find it unsatisfying talking abt it.

    1. @shaifamily
      unsatisfying and frustrating.

  3. I wish this article could be published beyond NS.

  4. Very well written and I totally agree with the message.

  5. Very insightful.

    @kaycee, note the spelling error below.
    “… a lecturer walks in and EXPANSIATES on ….”
    There is no such English word. It ought to be EXPATIATES.

    1. @supremo.you should be right.
      Thanks.

      1. Very welcome.

      2. SMH!!! He “should” ? Or “is”?

  6. A good article, Kaycee. It was Ben Okri, the author, who said that a people are reduced by their nightmares that they fail to confront. Why are Nigerians so scared of an objective discussion of the events that radically altered Nigeria’s equation between 1966-1970? I am not holding brief for anyone. Achebe has as much right to speak up on the events of the war as , let us say, Elechi Amadi (who was pro-Nigeria during the conflict and wrote a book on the subject titled SUNSET IN BIAFRA). Nigeria will not grow till we face the realities of our history. Agreed, there are dangers and they exist because of the nature of our elite who will continue to benefit from an ignorant populace. Why are the Americans still talking about their civil war, assassinations and the ugly era of the 1960s? No society thrives on self-denial and falsehood. Believe it, our heroes, including Ojukwu, Nzeogwu, Awolowo, etc, are idols with clay feet if the facts come to light. It serves to know these things. The process may hurt but we will be cleansed. Talk of suppressing info on Boko Haram forty years from now if the history of Nigeria’s religio-political conflicts is written.

    1. @ezeakwukwo
      Nice talk.
      Long time no see.

  7. Nice piece of writing. I agree to some extent. It was massacre jare not civil war…

    History has always been written by the winning side…
    No matter how good they try to paint the war, Biafra was defeated. The sins of the military should never have been transfered to the civilians. There had been several coups after that, did it lead to any killing? Even till today other parts of the country still harbor that misguided and stereotypical thoughts towards the Igbos. And the majority of them picked it up from the Nigerian version of the story. So it’s only proper to balance it by telling the Biafran side of the story by those who were in the middle of it then… I advocate for its inclusion in Nigerian history, otherwise history may repeat itself. It always does in Nigeria…

    1. The history is not exactly unknown anyway. We all know what went down. So whats the big deal?

  8. #gbam!

    Nicely written my brother. God bless you.

    “A country of excesses…” hmmnnnn.

  9. Very nice essay here.
    I agree that Nigeria has a lot of bias when it comes to our history esp Nig-Biafra but, I really disagree that keeping quiet about it is the way to go. Its like saying, let’s keep quiet and claim ignorance about boko haram cos we might hurt a certain religious extremists… so, let’s call them unknown gunmen and pretend they’re faceless.
    You’re right though, our history keeps us divided but then, we can only keep matching on a spot if we never confront our fears. I would never give my child for a war on history but then, wars we all know, take even bystanders. Nigeria must confront its history and even its present so that we know if its really ‘one Nigeria’ cos…even now, things have fallen apart and our center isn’t holding.

    1. @adaobiokwy
      What difference would teaching about Biafra make? What good would it bring?

  10. Wow. Truly truly, it’s a long time I have felt my mood change this much about something. This was moving.I always say Nigeria is a deceptively young country. We still have much evolving to do. I salute Ibo people for even though some of them (arguably majority) may be brainwashed, they’re the least prejudiced people and the most prejudiced against, almost like Jews in their own country. This doesn’t stop them from going about their business.

    As for the atrocities committed during the war and how they were viewed as tribal, I say this: show me a war without war crimes. Surely, it was a matter of chance that when the Ibo people want to split, everyone else would appear their enemy and thus it could be mistaken for a tribal affair. Like in Kaduna where I grew up, Kaje tribe are predominantly Christian and the Hausa, Muslim. When they fight over tribal things, it appears religious. I may have talked too much. Great rousing stuff. It should be put where other people can read it. I will reblog it if it’s on your blog.

    1. Thanks for reading. I particularly like your opinion.
      @vescucci

  11. Damn! This is great. Insightful, unbiased and very fluid.

    Keep improving your art bro. You sabi.

  12. “There are those who still love this country deep down in there hearts.”
    Should have been “their hearts” not “there”.

    Now to the crux of the matter:
    I really do think it is important that all facts be laid on the table, as best as can be but obviously it looks like there’ll always be that iota of prejudice and coy in baring it all.

    Personally, these hullaballo hasn’t resolved a thing for me as there are different sides to the tale from the many voices that have been lent to the Civil war crisis.

    I am almost too sure that there cannot be a definite closure to this thing but we all must agree that there are core lessons to be learnt and root causes to be addressed with utmost urgency.

    1. @midas
      Thanks for that correction.

Leave a Reply